Sayid Bnefsi

sayid bnefsi

Hello!

I am a law and philosophy scholar based in New York City. I work as an Assistant Professor in the Philosophy Department at Fairfield University.

In 2024-25, I was an SNSF post-doctoral fellow at the University of Neuchâtel in Switzerland. In 2023, I was an Ernst Mach pre-doctoral fellow at the University of Salzburg in Austria.

Willful Ignorance in Law and Epistemology, in 204 Synthese 171 (2024) (Article)

Compensatory Preliminary Damages: Access to Justice as Corrective Justice, in 27 CUNY Law Review 70 (2024) (Note)

Future Bias and Regret, in David Jakobsen, Peter Øhrstrøm & Per Hasle (eds.), Logic and Philosophy of Time 1 (2023) Aalborg: Aalborg University Press (Chapter)

Epistemic Isomorphism, in 53(4) Metaphilosophy 543 (2022) (Article)

Great Risks from Small Benefits Grow, in 49 Philosophia 603 (2021) (Essay)

The Argument from Sideways Music, in 9(1) Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 64 (2020) (Essay)

Future Bias and Presentism, in David Jakobsen, Per Hasle & Peter Øhrstrøm (eds.), The Metaphysics of Time 281 (2020) Aalborg: Aalborg University Press (Chapter)

B-Theory and Time Biases, in Patrick Blackburn, Per Hasle & Peter Øhrstrøm (eds.), Logic and Philosophy of Time 41 (Vol. 2) (2019) Aalborg: Aalborg University Press (Chapter)

My research explores philosophical and policy questions concerning substantive problems in criminal and civil justice.

My doctoral dissertation, Ways to Reform the Law, was the first step in this research program. There, I offer three proposals that rework existing features and powers of the law to provide answers to some blended questions of philosophy and public policy—questions involving (1) the fair allocation of costs in litigation, (2) the possibility of holding individuals liable in tort for reckless conduct even if the risk does not materialize, and (3) the justification of the practice of differential punishment of criminal attempts.

My current work is a continuation of my research program. This work involves analyzing justifications, excuses, and exculpatory defenses to criminal culpability as a way to elucidate general principles about legal responsibility, punishment, and criminal law.